Laser boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing · California

Inotech Laser Processing Inc.

San Jose, CA · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. runs at 88% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Laser boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Inotech Laser Processing Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 88% of Laser boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. safety composite

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Inotech Laser Processing Inc.: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 58.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2023

Inotech Laser Processing Inc.'s TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 5.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 58.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 88% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO Superior Aerospace
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Superior Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Inotech Laser Processing Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (88% of the Laser boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=58.5 · 2023=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Inotech Laser Processing Inc. falls in its industry

391 Laser boring, drilling, and cu establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Laser boring, drilling, and cu employers in California.

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. (33 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Inotech Laser Processing Inc.
Inotech Laser Processing Inc. (33 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Inotech Laser Processing Inc. has fewer employees than the Laser boring, drilling, and cutting mach median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.8 5.8 2 0 0
2022 58.5 58.5 3 17 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · CA · San Jose

391 Laser boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Superior Aerospace 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chiron 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Tool Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gemcor/Ascent Aerospace 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR Santa Fe Health and Rehabilitation Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Baierl Ford 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR L492-Curry Honda 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit 447 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE HDN Hayden Steamboat- Yampa Valley Airport 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Specialty Contracting Inc. 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ernest Packaging Solutions Arizona 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davidson Brothers Inc. 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.