Beds, sleep-system ensembles (i.e., flotation, adjustable), manufacturing · California

E.S. Kluft & Co.

Rancho Cucamonga, CA · ~163 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.S. Kluft & Co. runs at 201% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beds, sleep-system ensembles (i.e., flotation, adjustable), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

E.S. Kluft & Co.: 6.6 TCR = 201% of Beds, sleep-system ensembles (i.e., flotation, adjustable), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.S. Kluft & Co. safety composite

E.S. Kluft & Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2020→2024

E.S. Kluft & Co. injury rate improved

E.S. Kluft & Co.'s TCR fell 1.9 from 8.0 in 2020 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=8.0 · 2022=8.0 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 201% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Original Mattress Fa…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Original Mattress Factory - Pittsburgh (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

E.S. Kluft & Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.S. Kluft & Co. averages 6.6 TCR (201% of the Beds, sleep-system ensembles (i.e., flotation, adjustable), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.S. Kluft & Co. TCR series: 2020=8 · 2022=8 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where E.S. Kluft & Co. falls in its industry

160 Beds, sleep-system ensembles ( establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Beds, sleep-system ensembles ( employers in California.

E.S. Kluft & Co. (163 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate E.S. Kluft & Co.
E.S. Kluft & Co. (163 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

E.S. Kluft & Co. has more employees than the Beds, sleep-system ensembles (i.e., flot median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 4.9 10 0 0
2023 4.4 3.8 7 0 0
2022 8.0 8.0 15 0 0
2020 8.0 4.3 9 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · CA · Rancho Cucamonga

160 Beds, sleep-system ensembles (i.e., flotation, adjustable), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 229 employers in Rancho Cucamonga, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Original Mattress Factory - Pittsburgh 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Original Mattress Factory 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serta Simmons Bedding Moreno Valley 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visionary Sleep - Indiana 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Andersen & Sons Shelling 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Legacy 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hughson Nut, Inc - Livingston Facility 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE CORONADO LABOR CONTRACTING, Inc. 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 304 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davis Development Company, Inc. 1,214 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUCAMONGA 809 FTE
CITY-NEAR VIP,INC. Rancho Cucamonga 751 FTE
NAT-TCR Hamer Plant 73 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Naples Mazda 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Tucson Central 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal-Matic, LLC Minneapolis Plant 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Antigo Wi - 3205 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Antioch Il - 3211 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carpentersville Il - 3148 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus West Oh - 3365 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.