Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · North Carolina

The Original Mattress Factory

Raleigh, NC · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Original Mattress Factory runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

The Original Mattress Factory: 6.7 TCR = 204% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Original Mattress Factory safety composite

The Original Mattress Factory scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2021

The Original Mattress Factory injury rate improved

The Original Mattress Factory's TCR fell 5.5 from 9.5 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.5 · 2017=3.0 · 2018=6.0 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Raleigh, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 204% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/12
  • PHOTO Original Mattress Fa…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Original Mattress Factory - Pittsburgh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Original Mattress Factory in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Original Mattress Factory averages 6.7 TCR (204% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Original Mattress Factory TCR series: 2016=9.5 · 2017=3 · 2018=6 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=4 · BLS 3.3

Where The Original Mattress Factory falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 12 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in North Carolina.

The Original Mattress Factory (32 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Original Mattress Factory
The Original Mattress Factory (32 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

The Original Mattress Factory has fewer employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 11.2 7.5 3 0 0
2018 6.0 3.0 2 0 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2016 9.5 6.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · NC · Raleigh

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Original Mattress Factory - Pittsburgh 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR E.S. Kluft & Co. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serta Simmons Bedding Moreno Valley 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Visionary Sleep - Indiana 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Mondelez Global - Morris DC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington - Bound Tree 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lactalis American Group Inc. - Belmont 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR W Chicago Lakeshore 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Revlis - Norton 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sparton 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE NRP-IN 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cass City, MI 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.