Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Estee Lauder - Keystone

Bristol, PA · ~670 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Estee Lauder - Keystone runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Estee Lauder - Keystone: 0.7 TCR = 21% of Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Estee Lauder - Keystone safety composite

Estee Lauder - Keystone scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Estee Lauder - Keystone injury rate improved

Estee Lauder - Keystone's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Bristol, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO Englewood Lab, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~670 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Englewood Lab, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Estee Lauder - Keystone in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Estee Lauder - Keystone averages 0.7 TCR (21% of the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Estee Lauder - Keystone TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Estee Lauder - Keystone falls in its industry

260 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos employers in Pennsylvania.

Estee Lauder - Keystone (670 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Estee Lauder - Keystone
Estee Lauder - Keystone (670 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Estee Lauder - Keystone has more employees than the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, de median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2020 1.5 1.1 4 0 0
2019 1.1 0.5 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.1 0.6 4 0 0
2016 0.8 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · PA · Bristol

260 Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 67 employers in Bristol, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Englewood Lab, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Botanical Extract Manufacturer 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barbasol, LLC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR United-Guardian, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABF Freight 042 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE PITTSBURGH NDC_1436575 669 FTE
STATE-SIZE PITG 671 FTE
STATE-SIZE Care and Help 669 FTE
CITY-NEAR PA-02 4,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Philadelphia 1,661 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estee Lauder - PADC 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estee Lauder - PALC 335 FTE
NAT-TCR San Diego 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bennett Die & Tool 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BASF Engineering Plastics Compounding 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HMATN01 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franklin 50 670 FTE
NAT-SIZE Romeoville 670 FTE
NAT-SIZE Commercial Contracting Corporation 670 FTE
NAT-SIZE casino 670 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.