Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing · New York

Estee Lauder - Ruland

Melville, NY · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Estee Lauder - Ruland runs at 6% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Estee Lauder - Ruland: 0.3 TCR = 6% of Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Estee Lauder - Ruland safety composite

Estee Lauder - Ruland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Estee Lauder - Ruland held a steady TCR band

Estee Lauder - Ruland's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Melville, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 6% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/225
  • PHOTO Olive Branch - MS2
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olive Branch - MS2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Estee Lauder - Ruland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Estee Lauder - Ruland averages 0.3 TCR (6% of the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Estee Lauder - Ruland TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Estee Lauder - Ruland falls in its industry

9,477 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 225 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos employers in New York.

Estee Lauder - Ruland (23 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Estee Lauder - Ruland
Estee Lauder - Ruland (23 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Estee Lauder - Ruland has fewer employees than the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, de median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NY · Melville

9,477 Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 112 employers in Melville, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olive Branch - MS2 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN - Multi-Client 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Warehouse : ROMEOVILLE RMV 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Reading PRD 0.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Singer Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sheland Farms LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE McKnight's River Breeze Farm, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stein Farms LLC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northwell 5,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canon Solutions America 4,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Estee Lauder - 350 SSR 1,375 FTE
CITY-NEAR 355311-MID-ISLAND NY P&DC 1,258 FTE
NAT-TCR Walbar Peabody LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Meriter Laboratories 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisk Electric Company - Houston, TX 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Division 32 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE East Penn Container Decorating 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Mills 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paul Downs Cabinetmakers - Bridgeport PA 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mold-Tech Midwest 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.