Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge · Massachusetts

E.T.& L. Corp.

Stow, MA · ~106 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.T.& L. Corp. runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge workplace, earning a grade F.

E.T.& L. Corp.: 7.3 TCR = 260% of Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.T.& L. Corp. safety composite

E.T.& L. Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2024

E.T.& L. Corp. injury rate improved

E.T.& L. Corp.'s TCR fell 6.0 from 8.8 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.8 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=3.0 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Stow, MA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 260% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #50/56
  • PHOTO ATS Drilling
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ATS Drilling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

E.T.& L. Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.T.& L. Corp. averages 7.3 TCR (260% of the Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.T.& L. Corp. TCR series: 2016=8.8 · 2017=8.7 · 2018=10.2 · 2019=9.2 · 2020=9.5 · 2021=3 · 2022=9.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 2.8

Where E.T.& L. Corp. falls in its industry

4,078 Construction management, highw establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 56 Construction management, highw employers in Massachusetts.

E.T.& L. Corp. (106 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate E.T.& L. Corp.
E.T.& L. Corp. (106 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

E.T.& L. Corp. has more employees than the Construction management, highway, road, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2023 3.6 1.2 3 0 0
2022 9.5 6.0 7 1 0
2021 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2020 9.5 1.1 9 0 0
2019 9.2 1.0 9 0 0
2018 10.2 3.4 8 1 0
2017 8.7 2.0 12 1 0
2016 8.8 5.9 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · MA · Stow

4,078 Construction management, highway, road, street and bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 6 employers in Stow, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ATS Drilling 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Bridge Company - 422210 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAGINAW EAST SIDE GARAGE -MDOT 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedrock Concrete LLC 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Lawrence 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAS Building & Bridge, Inc. 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Methuen 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Romanow Container 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bose Stow 482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters - CPI Radant Technologies Division Inc. 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-000002584 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-02584 108 FTE
NAT-TCR Tex-Mix New Braunfels 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunshine Ace Hardware-Naples 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakpointe Senior Care & Rehab Center 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Central Electric Power Cooperative 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morristown (OVC) 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMI Corp. 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canon Egg Farm 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.