Telecommunications carriers, wired · Puerto Rico

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO

Carolina, PR · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO runs at 1040% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Telecommunications carriers, wired workplace, earning a grade F.

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO: 7.3 TCR = 1040% of Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO safety composite

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO injury rate improved

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO's TCR fell 3.3 from 9.8 in 2016 to 6.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.8 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=12.7 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=6.0 · 2024=6.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517110 · Carolina, PR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 1040% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #53/71
  • PHOTO NY0517N4
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NY0517N4 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Puerto Rico employers → · Look up another →

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO averages 7.3 TCR (1040% of the Telecommunications carriers, wired BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO TCR series: 2016=9.8 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=12.7 · 2019=2 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=3 · 2023=6 · 2024=6.5 · BLS 0.7

Where CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO falls in its industry

537 Telecommunications carriers, w establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Puerto Rico alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 71 Telecommunications carriers, w employers in Puerto Rico.

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO (50 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO
CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO (50 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 276 employees and a TCR of 1.3

CLARO / PRT - Carolina CO has fewer employees than the Telecommunications carriers, wired median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.5 6.5 1 1 0
2023 6.0 6.0 1 1 0
2022 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2021 15.3 10.2 5 1 0
2020 4.2 4.2 1 1 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 12.7 7.3 3 4 0
2017 6.1 6.1 0 3 0
2016 9.8 7.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517110 · PR · Carolina

537 Telecommunications carriers, wired employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,632 rated employers in Puerto Rico with headcount on file · 106 employers in Carolina, PR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NY0517N4 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Aguadilla CO (Cuesta Vieja) 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CLARO / PRT - Centro Operaciones Lomas Verdes 7.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LUMA, Ponce 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE HBS 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Expressway Graphics Corp 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4016-10064000 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis Security - Regiones 4,698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Del Carbe Inc - Carolina 1,082 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Del Carbe Inc Carolina 1,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universidad Ana G. Mendez - Carolina 966 FTE
NAT-TCR Tex-Mix New Braunfels 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR E.T.& L. Corp. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunshine Ace Hardware-Naples 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakpointe Senior Care & Rehab Center 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE DY 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE J & A Manufacturing Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Dies, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Memphis Fence & Construction, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.