Caftans, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) · Ohio

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co

Kent, OH · ~106 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Caftans, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) workplace, earning a grade C.

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co: 3.2 TCR = 98% of Caftans, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co safety composite

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2018

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co injury rate improved

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co's TCR fell 3.8 from 5.1 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.1 · 2018=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315220 · Kent, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Edwards Garment Co.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edwards Garment Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co averages 3.2 TCR (98% of the Caftans, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2018=1.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co falls in its industry

46 Caftans, men's and boys', cut establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Caftans, men's and boys', cut employers in Ohio.

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co (106 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co
Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co (106 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Euclid Vidaro Mfg. Co has fewer employees than the Caftans, men's and boys', cut and sewn f median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2016 5.1 3.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315220 · OH · Kent

46 Caftans, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 188 employers in Kent, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edwards Garment Co. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR W Diamond Group 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Factory/Manufacturing & Distribution Center 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williamson-Dickie Fort Worth Service Center I 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Roofing & Insulating Company 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - DuPont 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metcon Ltd 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Witmer's Feed & Grain Inc 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARTER LUMBER CORPORATE OFFICE 600 786 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3722 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3722 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Podnar Plastics, Inc. 324 FTE
NAT-TCR Cornelia Protein Conversion Plant 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR National and Alamo Car Rental 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Londonderry 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Phillips-Moldex, Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silver Eagle Distributors, L.P. - Rosenberg 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Starcon @ MPC Catlettsburg 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Property Management - Parks and Recreation 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cumberland Nursing & Rehab 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.