Public property management services, government · North Carolina

Property Management - Parks and Recreation

Greensboro, NC · ~106 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Property Management - Parks and Recreation runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Public property management services, government workplace, earning a grade B.

Property Management - Parks and Recreation: 2.2 TCR = 70% of Public property management services, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Property Management - Parks and Recreation safety composite

Property Management - Parks and Recreation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2018

Property Management - Parks and Recreation injury rate improved

Property Management - Parks and Recreation's TCR fell 2.3 from 4.5 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/105
  • PHOTO Town of Guilford Tow…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~106 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Town of Guilford Town Hall (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Property Management - Parks and Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Property Management - Parks and Recreation averages 2.2 TCR (70% of the Public property management services, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Property Management - Parks and Recreation TCR series: 2016=4.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.2 · BLS 3.2

Where Property Management - Parks and Recreation falls in its industry

1,496 Public property management ser establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 105 Public property management ser employers in North Carolina.

Property Management - Parks and Recreation (106 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Property Management - Parks and Recreation
Property Management - Parks and Recreation (106 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Property Management - Parks and Recreation has more employees than the Public property management services, gov median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.5 2.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · NC · Greensboro

1,496 Public property management services, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Town of Guilford Town Hall 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Surprise (Parks and Rec) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Development 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Finance 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRB Group - Raleigh 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gentry service Group 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Eden NC 106 FTE
STATE-SIZE UN1F1ED2NC 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #791 (Forest City, IA) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayes Manufacturing, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Covanta Honolulu Resource Recovery Venture, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 30024 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Sparta 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silver Eagle Distributors, L.P. - Rosenberg 106 FTE
NAT-SIZE Starcon @ MPC Catlettsburg 106 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.