Scheduled air passenger carriers · Oregon

Eugene Horizon

Eugene, OR · ~27 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eugene Horizon runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled air passenger carriers workplace, earning a grade F.

Eugene Horizon: 10.6 TCR = 234% of Scheduled air passenger carriers BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eugene Horizon safety composite

Eugene Horizon scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2016→2024

Eugene Horizon injury rate improved

Eugene Horizon's TCR fell 5.6 from 13.9 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 24.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=13.9 · 2017=17.9 · 2018=18.4 · 2019=24.6 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Eugene, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 234% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #17/25
  • PHOTO 4795-EA-SAN-SAN DIEG…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4795-EA-SAN-SAN DIEGO-SAN-TRML (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Eugene Horizon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eugene Horizon averages 10.6 TCR (234% of the Scheduled air passenger carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eugene Horizon TCR series: 2016=13.9 · 2017=17.9 · 2018=18.4 · 2019=24.6 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Eugene Horizon falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled air passenger carrie establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 25 Scheduled air passenger carrie employers in Oregon.

Eugene Horizon (27 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Eugene Horizon
Eugene Horizon (27 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

Eugene Horizon has fewer employees than the Scheduled air passenger carriers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 2 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.4 7.4 1 0 0
2019 24.6 12.3 4 0 0
2018 18.4 13.8 4 0 0
2017 17.9 13.5 4 0 0
2016 13.9 7.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · OR · Eugene

1,568 Scheduled air passenger carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 466 employers in Eugene, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-SAN-SAN DIEGO-SAN-TRML 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IAD-WASHINGTON - DULLES 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-AA-AUS-AUSTIN-AUS-TRML 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-BHM-BIRMINGHAM-EAGLE ACS 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gold Dust Potato Processors, Inc. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE NW Transplants LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLEMAN AGRICULTURE INC 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR MATT KNIGHT ARENA 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hult Center for the Performing Arts 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG PHOR Clinics 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at University District 564 FTE
NAT-TCR Hunter Truck - Smithfield 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hersheypark Camping Resort 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR White Oak Mills 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Main Office - 01 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #21 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waste Industries Sampson County Landfill 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #60 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lexington Transport 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.