Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

White Oak Mills

Elizabethtown, PA · ~54 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

White Oak Mills runs at 271% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

White Oak Mills: 10.6 TCR = 271% of Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

White Oak Mills safety composite

White Oak Mills scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.7

2016→2024

White Oak Mills injury rate improved

White Oak Mills's TCR fell 11.7 from 15.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.4 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=24.0 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Elizabethtown, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 271% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #40/42
  • PHOTO Gainesville Blend Mill
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gainesville Blend Mill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

White Oak Mills in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows White Oak Mills averages 10.6 TCR (271% of the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

White Oak Mills TCR series: 2016=15.4 · 2017=13.5 · 2018=8 · 2019=9.6 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=24 · 2022=12.4 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.9

Where White Oak Mills falls in its industry

756 Animal feed mills (except dog establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 42 Animal feed mills (except dog employers in Pennsylvania.

White Oak Mills (54 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate White Oak Mills
White Oak Mills (54 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

White Oak Mills has more employees than the Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 3.7 2 0 0
2023 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2022 12.4 3.5 7 0 0
2021 24.0 20.6 2 12 0
2020 6.5 3.3 4 0 0
2019 9.6 6.4 6 0 0
2018 8.0 3.2 5 0 0
2017 13.5 7.5 8 1 0
2016 15.4 9.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · PA · Elizabethtown

756 Animal feed mills (except dog and cat) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 47 employers in Elizabethtown, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gainesville Blend Mill 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Josh's Frogs 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nutra Blend Mason City 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR T'ville Feed Mill (Snow Hill) 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRIPLE-M-FARMS 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scrubgrass Reclamation Company L.P. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 269-NiSource-Washington PA-Service 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagman Construction Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masonic Villages at Elizabethtown 1,879 FTE
CITY-NEAR ELZ 327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8010130 Mars Snackfood Elizabethtown 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DPH7 248 FTE
NAT-TCR Carothers & Son, Ltd - Industrial Air Systems 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Eugene Horizon 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Afton 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE NSEW Corporation 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkway Elevators Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Check Point 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.