Retirement communities, continuing care · Pennsylvania

Evangelical Manor

Philadelphia, PA · ~268 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evangelical Manor runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Evangelical Manor: 13.0 TCR = 343% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evangelical Manor safety composite

Evangelical Manor scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2019→2023

Evangelical Manor injury rate improved

Evangelical Manor's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.6 in 2019 to 0.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 24.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.6 · 2020=22.9 · 2021=24.9 · 2022=13.7 · 2023=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Philadelphia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 343% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #216/257
  • PHOTO Starling at Nocatee …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~268 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Evangelical Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evangelical Manor averages 13.0 TCR (343% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evangelical Manor TCR series: 2019=3.6 · 2020=22.9 · 2021=24.9 · 2022=13.7 · 2023=0.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Evangelical Manor falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #216 safest of 257 Retirement communities, contin employers in Pennsylvania.

Evangelical Manor (268 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Evangelical Manor
Evangelical Manor (268 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Evangelical Manor has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.2 0.2 7 22 0
2022 13.7 13.7 6 16 0
2021 24.9 24.4 6 41 0
2020 22.9 22.9 2 51 0
2019 3.6 3.1 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Philadelphia

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,431 employers in Philadelphia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Place 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Bonita Springs III 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookwood Retirement Community 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Range Resources - Appalachia, LLC 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE UGI Utilities Reading 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hempt Bros., Inc 268 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. 268 FTE
CITY-NEAR FIVE BELOW INC 19,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital of University of Pennsylvania 13,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Hospital 9,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Main Campus 9,129 FTE
NAT-TCR St Leonard 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-03301 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02225 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0020-0020-03854 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Porto's Bakery Burbank, Inc. 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesis Private Security 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Records 268 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex-N-Gate Rockford Inc 268 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.