Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living

Ponte Vedra, FL · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living runs at 343% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living: 13.0 TCR = 343% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living safety composite

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2019→2023

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living injury rate improved

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living's TCR fell 11.2 from 18.3 in 2019 to 7.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 21.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=18.3 · 2020=21.4 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Ponte Vedra, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.0 · 343% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #244/283
  • PHOTO Evangelical Manor
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evangelical Manor (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living averages 13.0 TCR (343% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living TCR series: 2019=18.3 · 2020=21.4 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=7.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #244 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living (78 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living
Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living (78 employees, TCR 13.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Starling at Nocatee Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.1 5.3 4 0 0
2022 5.4 5.4 3 0 0
2020 21.4 5.3 12 0 0
2019 18.3 18.3 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Ponte Vedra

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 11 employers in Ponte Vedra, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evangelical Manor 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hickory Place 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Bonita Springs III 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookwood Retirement Community 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care Florida LLC.-Lakeland 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE System Headquarters 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE HO1 Gulfstream Service Center 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE One Pasco Center 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1243 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Natural Life Collections 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advanced Disposal - Corporate Office 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Vassar-Warner Home 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gresham #047 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HW Johnson Concrete Construction 13.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 13.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodruff Manor 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stellar Broadway Management LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bbec LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE office 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.