Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing · California

Evans Mfg Inc

Garden Grove, CA · ~135 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evans Mfg Inc runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Evans Mfg Inc: 3.1 TCR = 94% of Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evans Mfg Inc safety composite

Evans Mfg Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2019

Evans Mfg Inc injury rate improved

Evans Mfg Inc's TCR fell 1.1 from 3.8 in 2017 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.8 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Garden Grove, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #40/117
  • PHOTO UNIEK, INC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~135 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UNIEK, INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Evans Mfg Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evans Mfg Inc averages 3.1 TCR (94% of the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evans Mfg Inc TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Evans Mfg Inc falls in its industry

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., bask establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 117 Utility containers (e.g., bask employers in California.

Evans Mfg Inc (135 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Evans Mfg Inc
Evans Mfg Inc (135 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Evans Mfg Inc has more employees than the Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 0.7 4 0 0
2018 2.7 1.4 4 0 0
2017 3.8 1.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · CA · Garden Grove

2,838 Utility containers (e.g., baskets, bins, boxes, buckets, dishpans, pails), plastics (except foam), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 145 employers in Garden Grove, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UNIEK, INC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polaris Boardman 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GrassWorx LLC 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WW2 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vino Vid Inc 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saticoy Lemon Association - Oxnard 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers LP | Bakersfield Packinghouse 135 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Pak Avocado 135 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southland Industries 6,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR City Hall 677 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Wolf Lodge 649 FTE
CITY-NEAR King Janitorial Equipment Services 645 FTE
NAT-TCR T.P.I.a., LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ski Liberty Operating Corp. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 205 / 213 ~ Waukesha Pearce Industries Saginaw, Texas 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE #632 Dearborn Market 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boston Harbor (HR) 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ebed Communiy Improvement Inc 135 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koller Craft Plastic Products 135 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.