Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard · Kansas

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant

Lawrence, KS · ~807 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade C.

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant: 3.1 TCR = 94% of Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant safety composite

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant: 2.4 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.63× in 2019

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.4 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Lawrence, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK P51
  • PHOTO Manchester Industrie…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~807 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Manchester Industries Mendon (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant averages 3.1 TCR (94% of the Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=3.9 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant falls in its industry

236 Cards, die-cut (except office establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant (807 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant
Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant (807 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Hallmark Cards - Greetings Production Plant has more employees than the Cards, die-cut (except office supply) ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.3 1.9 26 3 0
2018 2.8 1.3 20 1 0
2017 3.9 2.5 29 0 0
2016 2.4 1.4 13 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · KS · Lawrence

236 Cards, die-cut (except office supply) made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lawrence, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Manchester Industries Mendon 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rizzo Packaging, Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDC FAB CO. dba Conwed 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Converting California 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goodwill Junction City 804 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landoll Corporation 803 FTE
STATE-SIZE 903 Overland Park 811 FTE
STATE-SIZE KSWIC035 ASCENSION VIA CHRISTI ST. JOSEPH 815 FTE
CITY-NEAR Berry Global 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amarr Entrematic 717 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 484 348 FTE
CITY-NEAR 484 340 FTE
NAT-TCR 628 - Troy 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 205 / 213 ~ Waukesha Pearce Industries Saginaw, Texas 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Behavioral Heath Works, San Diego, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Evans Mfg Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bemis North America - Office 807 FTE
NAT-SIZE D690-M001 807 FTE
NAT-SIZE DePuy Synthes Corporate Tech Center 1310 West Chester 807 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ogden City - Parks 807 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.