Heating equipment, warm air (i.e. forced air), merchant wholesalers · Colorado

Evans Warehouse

Denver, CO · ~145 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evans Warehouse runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heating equipment, warm air (i.e. forced air), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Evans Warehouse: 2.2 TCR = 99% of Heating equipment, warm air (i.e. forced air), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evans Warehouse safety composite

Evans Warehouse scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Evans Warehouse injury rate improved

Evans Warehouse's TCR fell 1.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423730 · Denver, CO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Minnesota Air, Inc. …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Evans Warehouse in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evans Warehouse averages 2.2 TCR (99% of the Heating equipment, warm air (i.e. forced air), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evans Warehouse TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=3.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=3 · 2024=2 · BLS 2.2

Where Evans Warehouse falls in its industry

290 Heating equipment, warm air (i establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Heating equipment, warm air (i employers in Colorado.

Evans Warehouse (145 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Evans Warehouse
Evans Warehouse (145 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Evans Warehouse has more employees than the Heating equipment, warm air (i.e. forced median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.0 3 0 0
2023 3.0 0.0 4 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.7 0.0 3 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 2 0 0
2017 3.6 0.0 4 0 0
2016 3.8 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423730 · CO · Denver

290 Heating equipment, warm air (i.e. forced air), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insight Partners - Raleigh 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Temperature Systems Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TNNAS 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE LONGS PEAK DAIRY LLC - PIERCE 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE RAH Colorado Division Office 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate office 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2636-COLORADO.CENTENNIAL 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Hamilton Kent LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Frontline Communications 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pregis- Plymouth 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Malvern, OH 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Climatech, Inc. 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE Warson 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE JLG - Hykes 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE S1 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.