Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers · Minnesota

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ)

Bloomington, MN · ~96 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ): 2.2 TCR = 99% of Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) safety composite

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) held a steady TCR band

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423730 · Bloomington, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO Evans Warehouse
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Evans Warehouse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) averages 2.2 TCR (99% of the Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=3.2 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) falls in its industry

290 Central heating equipment, war establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Central heating equipment, war employers in Minnesota.

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) (96 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ)
Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) (96 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Minnesota Air, Inc. (HQ) has more employees than the Central heating equipment, warm-air, mer median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 3.0 5 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 5 0 0
2021 4.6 0.0 4 0 0
2020 3.2 0.0 0 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423730 · MN · Bloomington

290 Central heating equipment, warm-air, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 306 employers in Bloomington, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Evans Warehouse 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Insight Partners - Raleigh 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Temperature Systems Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TNNAS 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South 501 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Lake Superior Sanitary District 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Associated Milk Producers Inc (Rochester Cheese Mfg) 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Domino's Supply Chain Center- Minnesota 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0081 BLOOMINGTON 8170 BLDG 2,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP - 8170 2,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington/Normandale 1,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Donaldson Company Inc. 1,390 FTE
NAT-TCR SBS San Francisco (Pleasanton) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Lift Trucks San Diego 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eunice Service Center 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Genco Masonry, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dwire Earthmoving LLC 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wisconsin Aviation Four Lakes 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE McFarlanes' Retail and Service Center 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Flesh Company 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.