Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Indiana

Evergreen Village at Bloomington

Bloomington, IN · ~66 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evergreen Village at Bloomington runs at 189% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Evergreen Village at Bloomington: 7.2 TCR = 189% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evergreen Village at Bloomington safety composite

Evergreen Village at Bloomington scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2021→2023

Evergreen Village at Bloomington injury rate improved

Evergreen Village at Bloomington's TCR fell 7.4 from 9.5 in 2021 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=9.5 · 2022=10.0 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bloomington, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 189% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #82/136
  • PHOTO The Waterford at Tho…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~66 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Waterford at Thousand Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Evergreen Village at Bloomington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evergreen Village at Bloomington averages 7.2 TCR (189% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evergreen Village at Bloomington TCR series: 2021=9.5 · 2022=10 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Evergreen Village at Bloomington falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 136 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

Evergreen Village at Bloomington (66 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Evergreen Village at Bloomington
Evergreen Village at Bloomington (66 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Evergreen Village at Bloomington has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 10.0 5.0 4 0 0
2021 9.5 0.0 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Bloomington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 204 employers in Bloomington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Thousand Oaks 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franciscan Sisters of Little Falls 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Waterford at Richmond Heights 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakeshore Manor 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Terre Haute Operations Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE AES Indiana (T&D) - Arlington Service Center 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE 573-NiSource-Angola IN-Operating HQ 66 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntington 04 66 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Incorporated Park 48 3,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Inc 2,976 FTE
CITY-NEAR CI-P48 2,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington 2,251 FTE
NAT-TCR Roosevelt Island Associates 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Luke's Jerome 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamond Wire Spring Company Pittsburgh Plant 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Straith Hospital for Special Surgery 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lithia TO Inc dba Lithia Toyota of Odessa 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harper International Corporation 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flowery Branch 66 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building 17 66 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.