Containers, wood, manufacturing · California

Everport Terminal Services, Inc.

San Pedro, CA · ~851 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Containers, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Everport Terminal Services, Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 146% of Containers, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. safety composite

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−19.2

2018→2024

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. injury rate improved

Everport Terminal Services, Inc.'s TCR fell 19.2 from 21.5 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=21.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · San Pedro, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 146% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #18/67
  • PHOTO CC-VA-CHASE CITY
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~851 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CC-VA-CHASE CITY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Everport Terminal Services, Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (146% of the Containers, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. TCR series: 2018=21.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.7 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=1.9 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Everport Terminal Services, Inc. falls in its industry

952 Containers, wood, manufacturin establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 67 Containers, wood, manufacturin employers in California.

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. (851 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Everport Terminal Services, Inc.
Everport Terminal Services, Inc. (851 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

Everport Terminal Services, Inc. has more employees than the Containers, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.7 3 7 0
2023 2.4 0.2 2 11 0
2022 1.9 0.6 4 8 0
2021 2.1 0.9 7 7 0
2020 1.7 0.8 4 5 0
2019 1.9 0.6 5 8 0
2018 21.5 9.4 12 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · CA · San Pedro

952 Containers, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 81 employers in San Pedro, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CC-VA-CHASE CITY 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWSI 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR A&D Packaging 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Pallets of Georgia, LLC. 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Alameda Hospital (includes Park Bridge & Southshore facilities) 851 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2576-078 851 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ulta Beauty WDC 850 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6403-64030166 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR APM Terminals Pacific LLC 1,638 FTE
CITY-NEAR WBCT Terminal 1,252 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000772 1,111 FTE
CITY-NEAR WCTSLB 1,078 FTE
NAT-TCR Island city particleboard 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgia Locations 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Clackamas County 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR C067 Greensboro 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Westover Hills 851 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaiser Aluminum - Trentwood 851 FTE
NAT-SIZE H&P U.S. Land - North 851 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omni Grove Park Inn 851 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.