Distribution of electric power · Connecticut

Eversource - Stamford

Stamford, CT · ~94 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eversource - Stamford runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Eversource - Stamford: 3.6 TCR = 304% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eversource - Stamford safety composite

Eversource - Stamford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Eversource - Stamford injury rate improved

Eversource - Stamford's TCR fell 2.0 from 6.3 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.3 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Stamford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.6 · 304% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #8/17
  • PHOTO Volunteer Energy Coo…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Volunteer Energy Cooperative - Crossville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Eversource - Stamford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eversource - Stamford averages 3.6 TCR (304% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eversource - Stamford TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=5.5 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=2 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=1 · 2024=4.3 · BLS 1.2

Where Eversource - Stamford falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 17 Distribution of electric power employers in Connecticut.

Eversource - Stamford (94 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eversource - Stamford
Eversource - Stamford (94 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Eversource - Stamford has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 1.4 3 0 0
2023 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2021 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2020 2.7 1.8 2 1 0
2019 4.2 3.4 5 0 0
2018 5.5 3.2 7 0 0
2017 3.8 2.8 4 0 0
2016 6.3 4.2 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · CT · Stamford

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 173 employers in Stamford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Volunteer Energy Cooperative - Crossville 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crystal Lake 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eversource - Hadley 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carmel 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caldwell & Walsh Building Construction, Inc. 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connecticut Office 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charter Oak 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE MacDermid Enthone, Inc. 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR CT-02 4,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stamford Health 3,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stamford Hospital 2,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,457 FTE
NAT-TCR McLean Ambulatory Surgery Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Prospect International Airport Services ATL 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Minot Slumberland. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid State Construction of Mississippi, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cyalume Technologies, Inc. 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #0224 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE avb 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown Industrial, Inc. 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.