Kitchenware, commercial and household-type, vitreous china, manufacturing · California

Everware International

Name: Everware International Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Chino, CA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.8
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Everware International runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Kitchenware, commercial and household-type, vitreous china, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Everware International: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Kitchenware, commercial and household-type, vitreous china, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Everware International safety composite

Everware International scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 2.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.6

2017→2018

Everware International injury rate improved

Everware International's TCR fell 5.6 from 5.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327110 · Chino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #3/5
PHOTO M Cubed Technologies
BOOK 2y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M Cubed Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pall Hauppuage

2.9
This site

2.8
M Cubed Techno

2.8
McDanel Advanc

2.8
Pall Life Scie

2.7

What this shows Everware International averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Kitchenware, commercial and household-type, vitreous china, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Everware International TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Everware International falls in its industry

109 Kitchenware, commercial and ho establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Kitchenware, commercial and ho employers in California.

Everware International (22 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Everware International has fewer employees than the Kitchenware, commercial and household-ty median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2018	0.0	0.0	0	0	0
2017	5.6	0.0	0	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327110 · CA · Chino

109 Kitchenware, commercial and household-type, vitreous china, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	M Cubed Technologies	MONROE, CT	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	McDanel Advanced Ceramic Technologies	BEAVER FALLS, PA	2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pall Life Sciences	HAUPPAUGE, NY	2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pall Hauppuage	HAUPPAUGE, NY	2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	LaGrande Farms	WILLIAMS	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Del Carlo Farms, Inc.	STOCKTON	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Linda Vista Farms	RIVERDALE	22 FTE
STATE-SIZE	MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP	BAKERSFIELD	22 FTE
CITY-NEAR	4078	Chino	2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR	8103	Chino	2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 4078	Chino	1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR	California Institution for Men	Chino	1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR	West Gables Health Care Center	Miami, FL	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	HES Duncan, OK (Plant 2)	Duncan, OK	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Faurecia - Fraser	Fraser, MI	2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Chicago II	Chicago, IL	2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Rose Hill Central Maintenance -Est	Rose Hill, NC	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Terre Haute Sow #6 & #2 -Est	Lucerne, MO	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Urban Strategies - Memphis Hope	Memphis, TN	22 FTE
NAT-SIZE	MacDonald & Owen Sparta	Sparta, WI	22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.