Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial warehouse · Rhode Island

E.W. Burman, Inc.

Warwick, RI · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.W. Burman, Inc. runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial warehouse workplace, earning a grade B.

E.W. Burman, Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 70% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial warehouse BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.W. Burman, Inc. safety composite

E.W. Burman, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

E.W. Burman, Inc. held a steady TCR band

E.W. Burman, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Warwick, RI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/22
  • PHOTO Kulback's, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kulback's, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

E.W. Burman, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.W. Burman, Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (70% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial warehouse BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.W. Burman, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=9.1 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where E.W. Burman, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 22 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Rhode Island.

E.W. Burman, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate E.W. Burman, Inc.
E.W. Burman, Inc. (32 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

E.W. Burman, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.1 3.5 2 0 0
2018 9.1 3.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · RI · Warwick

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial warehouse employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 207 employers in Warwick, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kulback's, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bentley Builders LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ironclad Services LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mar Con Builders 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Imperatore Steel Erectors, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England Union Co. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danecraft Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEBRI 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kent Hospital 1,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR RIPRO - PROVIDENCE 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Care New England Medical Group 1,264 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE (RIPRO) 1,244 FTE
NAT-TCR Nekoosa Coated Products (NCP) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR BP & SC Services 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Teikoku USA Inc. - Pennsylvania 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mark Anthony Brewing Company Glendale 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Herbs, Etc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Processing Systems 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Healthy Generations LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pfund Construction, Inc 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.