Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network · Michigan

Extreme Logistix LLC

Grand Rapids, MI · ~100 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Extreme Logistix LLC runs at 174% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network workplace, earning a grade D.

Extreme Logistix LLC: 11.3 TCR = 174% of Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Extreme Logistix LLC safety composite

Extreme Logistix LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2022→2024

Extreme Logistix LLC injury rate improved

Extreme Logistix LLC's TCR fell 11.6 from 12.3 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=12.3 · 2023=20.8 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Grand Rapids, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.3 · 174% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #149/202
  • PHOTO OHHAM - HAMILTON
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OHHAM - HAMILTON (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Extreme Logistix LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Extreme Logistix LLC averages 11.3 TCR (174% of the Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Extreme Logistix LLC TCR series: 2022=12.3 · 2023=20.8 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Extreme Logistix LLC falls in its industry

6,679 Local letter and parcel delive establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #149 safest of 202 Local letter and parcel delive employers in Michigan.

Extreme Logistix LLC (100 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Extreme Logistix LLC
Extreme Logistix LLC (100 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Extreme Logistix LLC has fewer employees than the Local letter and parcel delivery service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 11 0 0
2023 20.8 20.8 11 0 0
2022 12.3 12.3 5 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MI · Grand Rapids

6,679 Local letter and parcel delivery services as part of intercity courier network employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OHHAM - HAMILTON 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCMYR - MYRTLE BEACH CENTER 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 1270 N WILKENING ROAD 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon Delivery Station - Maspeth, NY 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jay Dee Contractors, Inc. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solomon Plumbing Co 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberClass Insulation 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eden Foods Headquarters 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City Distribution Center 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Curry Rail Services - Hockley 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohham - Hamilton 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Scmyr - Myrtle Beach Center 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DYR3 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE CGI Federal Inc - Western Passport Center 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wiljo Interiors 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dave Wright Nissan Subaru Inc 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.