Head offices · Texas

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus

Spring, TX · ~5,480 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Head offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus: 0.1 TCR = 7% of Head offices BLS 0.7 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus safety composite

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus held a steady TCR band

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Spring, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/86
  • PHOTO Englewood Cliffs
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~5,480 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Englewood Cliffs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus averages 0.1 TCR (7% of the Head offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.1 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.1 · BLS 0.7

Where Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus falls in its industry

1,475 Head offices establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 86 Head offices employers in Texas.

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus (5,480 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus
Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus (5,480 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus has more employees than the Head offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.1 0.0 2 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 2 0
2019 0.1 0.0 2 1 0
2018 0.1 0.0 3 2 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · TX · Spring

1,475 Head offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 212 employers in Spring, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Englewood Cliffs 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IBP Support Group 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10011 FL Merch Exec Leadership COS 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR INNSBROOK 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6839-1 5,335 FTE
STATE-SIZE L3 Technologies - Greenville 5,329 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
STATE-SIZE Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Inc. Houston 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 2,050 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Bureau of Shipping 1,159 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus 1,093 FTE
NAT-TCR SFR - Rodeo and Carbon Plant 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolverine Worldwide - Waltham Corporate Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 104000 - Calcasieu Pass 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Con Edison Clean Energy Businesses 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cook County Sheriff's Department 5,469 FTE
NAT-SIZE UConn Health Center 5,466 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana University Health Care Associates, Inc 5,465 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics Electric Boat Corp 5,460 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.