Employer · Texas

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus

Spring, TX · ~1,093 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus: 0.1 TCR = 7% of industry BLS 0.7 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus safety composite

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus held a steady TCR band

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.2 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Spring, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/86
  • PHOTO Englewood Cliffs
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,093 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Englewood Cliffs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus averages 0.1 TCR (7% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 0.7

Where ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus falls in its industry

1,475 industry establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 86 industry employers in Texas.

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus (1,093 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus
ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus (1,093 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.2 0.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · TX · Spring

1,475 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 212 employers in Spring, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Englewood Cliffs 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR IBP Support Group 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10011 FL Merch Exec Leadership COS 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR INNSBROOK 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE AUSTIN (TXAUS) 1,093 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : DAL9 1,093 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allison Tower 1,092 FTE
STATE-SIZE Covestro Baytown 1,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus 5,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Inc. Houston 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 2,050 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Bureau of Shipping 1,159 FTE
NAT-TCR CA-06 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR College Street 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR General Cable Highland Heights 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aibontio, Puerto Rico 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 356886-Queens Ny P&Dc 1,093 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anderson County Government 1,093 FTE
NAT-SIZE CITGO Petroleum Corporation 1,093 FTE
NAT-SIZE Durham, NC Facility 1,093 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.