Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid · Texas

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant

Beaumont, TX · ~411 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant runs at 1% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid workplace, earning a grade A.

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant: 0.0 TCR = 1% of Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant safety composite

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant held a steady TCR band

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325110 · Beaumont, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.0 · 1% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/38
  • PHOTO NOVA Chemicals - Gei…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~411 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NOVA Chemicals - Geismar Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ExxonMobil Chemical Plant averages 0.0 TCR (1% of the Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where ExxonMobil Chemical Plant falls in its industry

66 Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., bu establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 38 Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., bu employers in Texas.

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant (411 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 213 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 00.511.52 Average employees Total Case Rate ExxonMobil Chemical Plant
ExxonMobil Chemical Plant (411 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 213 employees and a TCR of 0.5

ExxonMobil Chemical Plant has more employees than the Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethy median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325110 · TX · Beaumont

66 Acyclic hydrocarbons (e.g., butene, ethylene, propene) (except acetylene) made from refined petroleum or liquid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 329 employers in Beaumont, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NOVA Chemicals - Geismar Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Baytown Chemical Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freeport, Texas 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LACC, LLC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE San Antonio TX 411 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #679 411 FTE
STATE-SIZE Houston Material Handling 411 FTE
STATE-SIZE 228 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaumont SCANfining Project (BMSF) 2,106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas 2,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4038-1618 1,189 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Beaumont Refinery 1,178 FTE
NAT-TCR Tim Neubauer Trucking LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Patterson Companies, Inc 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kansas City Headquarters 1KC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR General Office, US 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HEADQ 411 FTE
NAT-SIZE ZF-Washington-02 411 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spectrum Health - Reed City 411 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4795-AA-MCO-ORLANDO-MCO-TRML 411 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.