Employer · Texas

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing

The Woodlands, TX · ~1,429 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade A.

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing: 0.1 TCR = 19% of industry BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing safety composite

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing held a steady TCR band

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.2 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · The Woodlands, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/86
  • PHOTO CGP Corporate - Waln…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,429 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CGP Corporate - Walnut Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing averages 0.1 TCR (19% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing TCR series: 2016=0.2 · 2017=0.2 · 2018=0 · BLS 0.7

Where ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing falls in its industry

1,475 industry establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 86 industry employers in Texas.

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing (1,429 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing
ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing (1,429 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

ExxonMobil Global Services Company Hughes Landing has more employees than the industry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.2 0.1 1 2 0
2016 0.2 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · TX · The Woodlands

1,475 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 160 employers in The Woodlands, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CGP Corporate - Walnut Creek 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CREG Services Group, LLC (Ames) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXCOP - DALLAS SANDY LAKE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lyft San Francisco Corporate HQ 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. - LCO & MCO Offices 1,429 FTE
STATE-SIZE Port Arthur Liquefaction Project 1,428 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Tyler Processing 1,431 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : HOU1 1,427 FTE
CITY-NEAR Strike 3,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR MedData, Inc. 2,438 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital 2,185 FTE
CITY-NEAR W W Webber LLC 1,948 FTE
NAT-TCR Jabil-IT 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Iowa City North Dodge (ICND) 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Cox Communications - KS COE 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. Inc. 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homestead Hospital 1,429 FTE
NAT-SIZE RenCen - Tower 500 1,429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomson Reuters - New York 1,429 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burleigh Campus 1,430 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.