Corporate Subsidiary and Regional Managing Offices · Texas

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake

Coppell, TX · ~214 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Corporate Subsidiary and Regional Managing Offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake: 0.1 TCR = 19% of Corporate Subsidiary and Regional Managing Offices BLS 0.7 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake safety composite

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake held a steady TCR band

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.3 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.3 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Coppell, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/86
  • PHOTO CGP Corporate - Waln…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~214 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CGP Corporate - Walnut Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake averages 0.1 TCR (19% of the Corporate Subsidiary and Regional Managing Offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake TCR series: 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake falls in its industry

1,475 Corporate Subsidiary and Regio establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 86 Corporate Subsidiary and Regio employers in Texas.

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake (214 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake
Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake (214 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Txcop - Dallas Sandy Lake has more employees than the Corporate Subsidiary and Regional Managi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.5 0.5 0 1 0
2019 0.3 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · TX · Coppell

1,475 Corporate Subsidiary and Regional Managing Offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 192 employers in Coppell, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CGP Corporate - Walnut Creek 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR CREG Services Group, LLC (Ames) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lyft San Francisco Corporate HQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Topeka General Office 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oncor Transmission Operation Metro East 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Exxon-Beaumont 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE USA Gulf 214 FTE
STATE-SIZE BComm Constructors Creekview 214 FTE
CITY-NEAR Driveline Retail Merchandising 7,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : FTW6 3,496 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW6 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR 482273-NORTH TEXAS TX P&DC 1,373 FTE
NAT-TCR Marshall, MI 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Boca Corporate Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Surry Pwr Sta 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR View 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mtmis - Missoula 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safran Aerospace Composites 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Higgins General 214 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenfield 214 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.