Sign erection, highway, roads street or bridge · Vermont

F R Lafayette Inc

Essex Junction, VT · ~27 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

F R Lafayette Inc runs at 832% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sign erection, highway, roads street or bridge workplace, earning a grade F.

F R Lafayette Inc: 23.3 TCR = 832% of Sign erection, highway, roads street or bridge BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

F R Lafayette Inc safety composite

F R Lafayette Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.9

2016→2024

F R Lafayette Inc injury rate improved

F R Lafayette Inc's TCR fell 12.9 from 38.1 in 2016 to 25.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 38.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=38.1 · 2018=18.0 · 2019=33.2 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=22.1 · 2022=18.8 · 2023=15.0 · 2024=25.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Essex Junction, VT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.3 · 832% of ind

  • DART 9.5 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO GOGEBIC COUNTY ROAD …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GOGEBIC COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Vermont employers → · Look up another →

F R Lafayette Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows F R Lafayette Inc averages 23.3 TCR (832% of the Sign erection, highway, roads street or bridge BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

F R Lafayette Inc TCR series: 2016=38.1 · 2018=18 · 2019=33.2 · 2020=15.7 · 2021=22.1 · 2022=18.8 · 2023=15 · 2024=25.3 · BLS 2.8

Where F R Lafayette Inc falls in its industry

4,078 Sign erection, highway, roads establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Vermont alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Sign erection, highway, roads employers in Vermont.

F R Lafayette Inc (27 employees, TCR 23.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate F R Lafayette Inc
F R Lafayette Inc (27 employees, TCR 23.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

F R Lafayette Inc has fewer employees than the Sign erection, highway, roads street or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 25.3 9.5 7 1 0
2023 15.0 6.0 5 0 0
2022 18.8 9.4 6 0 0
2021 22.1 0.0 6 0 0
2020 15.7 9.4 5 0 0
2019 33.2 23.3 10 0 0
2018 18.0 10.8 5 0 0
2016 38.1 19.1 9 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · VT · Essex Junction

4,078 Sign erection, highway, roads street or bridge employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,065 rated employers in Vermont with headcount on file · 31 employers in Essex Junction, VT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GOGEBIC COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schermer Construction Inc 23.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR D5 Leverett Yard 23.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR D1 Eisenhower Yard 23.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE A.C. Hathorne Co. a Div. of Melanson Co. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Burlington 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE LaValley Ludlow Building Supply 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE CVE - Middlebury 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR GLOBALFOUNDRIES Burlington 2,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR GlobalFoundries - Burlington 1,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR VT - Essex - 30 Gauthier Dr - Keurig Green Mountain Inc 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR PLB 366 FTE
NAT-TCR 2024 Westover Rd 23.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Logistics Corp 23.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Casar - Santa Rosa Center 23.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Reaska Logistics Corp. 23.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Organic Valley Viroqua Truck Garage 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rose Street Center 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bowling Green OH 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jasper GA 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.