Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) · Michigan

FA Industrial Services, Inc

Iron River, MI · ~35 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FA Industrial Services, Inc runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) workplace, earning a grade B.

FA Industrial Services, Inc: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FA Industrial Services, Inc safety composite

FA Industrial Services, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

FA Industrial Services, Inc held a steady TCR band

FA Industrial Services, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Iron River, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/39
  • PHOTO HC Constructors Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HC Constructors Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

FA Industrial Services, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FA Industrial Services, Inc averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FA Industrial Services, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=6.4 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.9

Where FA Industrial Services, Inc falls in its industry

924 Construction management, indus establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 39 Construction management, indus employers in Michigan.

FA Industrial Services, Inc (35 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate FA Industrial Services, Inc
FA Industrial Services, Inc (35 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

FA Industrial Services, Inc has fewer employees than the Construction management, industrial buil median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · MI · Iron River

924 Construction management, industrial building (except warehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 10 employers in Iron River, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HC Constructors Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillsboro Concrete Buildings 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovative Construction Solutions Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GreenWood, Inc. - GE Aviation 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heeren, LLC - 42 North Apples 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harbor Farmz, North LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willow Point Dairy 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE POWER & UTILITIES OPERATIONS - ROB 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aspirus Iron River Hospital 206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Iron River Plant 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeshore Systems, Inc. Iron River 127 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hebert Construction Company 36 FTE
NAT-TCR TexasBit 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Western Utility LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 040 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR AJ Burk LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Monterey 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Butterball LLC Hatchery # 2 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barnes Crossing Medical Clinic 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Ridge Builders, Inc. 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.