Manufacturing building construction · Texas

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings

Hillsboro, TX · ~95 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Manufacturing building construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Manufacturing building construction BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings safety composite

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings injury rate improved

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.3 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Hillsboro, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #75/92
  • PHOTO HC Constructors Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HC Constructors Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hillsboro Concrete Buildings averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Manufacturing building construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings TCR series: 2016=3.3 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 2.9

Where Hillsboro Concrete Buildings falls in its industry

924 Manufacturing building constru establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 92 Manufacturing building constru employers in Texas.

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings (95 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hillsboro Concrete Buildings
Hillsboro Concrete Buildings (95 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Hillsboro Concrete Buildings has more employees than the Manufacturing building construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 1 1 0
2022 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.3 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · TX · Hillsboro

924 Manufacturing building construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 33 employers in Hillsboro, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HC Constructors Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovative Construction Solutions Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR GreenWood, Inc. - GE Aviation 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR FA Industrial Services, Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacesetter Homes, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockin R Construction 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE S Thomas Construction, LLC 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bobcat Contracting LLC 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 211 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR 211 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wisenbaker Builder Services - Hillsboro 250 FTE
NAT-TCR Milwaukee Home2 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR DeRoyal Foam/Converting 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Beck Farms LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Related Health Services, d/b/a Health Zone 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Jersey PDC 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairview Fellowship Home 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE SRC Medical, Inc. 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris & Hart, Inc. - Intel Ocotillo 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.