Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Colorado

Fair Winds Logistics

Denver, CO · ~64 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fair Winds Logistics runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Fair Winds Logistics: 15.5 TCR = 238% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fair Winds Logistics safety composite

Fair Winds Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fair Winds Logistics: 0.0 → 27.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 27.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.6× in 2024

Fair Winds Logistics's TCR rose 27.9 from 0.0 in 2022 to 27.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 238% of ind

  • DART 24.8 DART
  • RANK #110/140
  • PHOTO See It Thru Logistic…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: See It Thru Logistics LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Fair Winds Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fair Winds Logistics averages 15.5 TCR (238% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fair Winds Logistics TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=18.5 · 2024=27.9 · BLS 6.5

Where Fair Winds Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #110 safest of 140 Express delivery services (exc employers in Colorado.

Fair Winds Logistics (64 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Fair Winds Logistics
Fair Winds Logistics (64 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Fair Winds Logistics has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 27.9 24.8 18 0 0
2023 18.5 10.3 9 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CO · Denver

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR See It Thru Logistics LLC 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 902500000 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mamba Logistics, Inc. 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FedEx 2011 FACTORY LANE 15.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hayden Station-948 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Murray & Stafford Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE nationwide 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Modern Railway Systems - All Non-Office Projects 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Vsr LLC 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PAM Rehab Roundrock 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oaks Correctional Facility 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Police Department 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Devereux Skilled Nursing and Rehabiltion Center 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE On The Spot Transportation 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dunaway Timber Company 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6711 Belvedere Rd, West Palm Beach, FL.33413 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.