Packaging and Labeling Services · Georgia

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging

Fairburn, GA · ~190 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging and Labeling Services workplace, earning a grade A.

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging: 0.8 TCR = 29% of Packaging and Labeling Services BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging safety composite

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging held a steady TCR band

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561910 · Fairburn, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Thermo Fisher Scient…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thermo Fisher Scientific IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging averages 0.8 TCR (29% of the Packaging and Labeling Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging TCR series: 2021=0.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 2.6

Where Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging falls in its industry

228 Packaging and Labeling Service establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Packaging and Labeling Service employers in Georgia.

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging (190 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging
Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging (190 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging has more employees than the Packaging and Labeling Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 3 0 0
2021 0.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561910 · GA · Fairburn

228 Packaging and Labeling Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 98 employers in Fairburn, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific IN 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Bolingbrook 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Alsip 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCI Pharma Services 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 829 Jefferson St Atlanta 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Country Home Baker 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jordan Forest Products Barnesville 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE US GA Morrow Plant 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Material in Motion, LLC. 1,076 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA - USPS Fairburn9 828 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duracell Atlanta (MRU5102) 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Foods Atlanta 655 FTE
NAT-TCR SWI Barry -Lawrence County 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Seapointe Village Realty, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Carl Zeiss Inc-Corporate Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dupont Fayetteville 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Hardware Distributing Co - Distribution Center 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Penguin Computing 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bianchi Electric 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE pictsweet 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.