Computer servers manufacturing · California

Penguin Computing

Fremont, CA · ~190 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Penguin Computing runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Computer servers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Penguin Computing: 0.9 TCR = 26% of Computer servers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Penguin Computing safety composite

Penguin Computing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2023

Penguin Computing injury rate improved

Penguin Computing's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.0 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334111 · Fremont, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/33
  • PHOTO Crestron Electronics…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~190 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crestron Electronics - Orangeburg, NY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Penguin Computing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Penguin Computing averages 0.9 TCR (26% of the Computer servers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Penguin Computing TCR series: 2018=1 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=2 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Penguin Computing falls in its industry

114 Computer servers manufacturing establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 33 Computer servers manufacturing employers in California.

Penguin Computing (190 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Penguin Computing
Penguin Computing (190 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 236 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Penguin Computing has fewer employees than the Computer servers manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 3 0 0
2020 2.0 1.0 4 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2018 1.0 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334111 · CA · Fremont

114 Computer servers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crestron Electronics - Orangeburg, NY 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Foxconn Assembly LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loc: CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - MESA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZT Systems 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Zuckerman Family Farms 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Margarita Water District 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE City Of Sacramento-Field Services Division Roll-Up (140014) 190 FTE
STATE-SIZE Courtney Inc. 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR Nam Dae Mun Farmers Market Lilburn 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SABIC Innovative Plastics Mt. Vernon, LLC. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MRC Global -152 Toledo, OH 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Cashman Equipment Corp 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Hardware Distributing Co - Distribution Center 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairburn Packaging : Fairburn Packaging 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bianchi Electric 190 FTE
NAT-SIZE pictsweet 190 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.