Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational · Washington

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds

Fairchild Air Force Base, WA · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational workplace, earning a grade D.

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds: 6.2 TCR = 162% of Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds safety composite

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2022→2024

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds injury rate improved

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds's TCR fell 11.4 from 11.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=11.4 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Fairchild Air Force Base, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/18
  • PHOTO Compass Career EMP -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Compass Career EMP - Spokane (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds averages 6.2 TCR (162% of the Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds TCR series: 2022=11.4 · 2023=7.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds falls in its industry

1,455 Rehabilitation job counseling establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 18 Rehabilitation job counseling employers in Washington.

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds (59 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds
Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds (59 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Fairchild Airforce Base Custodial Grounds has more employees than the Rehabilitation job counseling and traini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.1 4.7 3 0 0
2022 11.4 8.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · WA · Fairchild Air Force Base

1,455 Rehabilitation job counseling and training, vocational employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 3 employers in Fairchild Air Force Base, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Compass Career EMP - Spokane 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shrewsbury Store 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovative Industries 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parma AAC 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE John I. Haas, Inc. - Warehouse Division 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nationwide Solar 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Precision Concrete LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE CHG Building Systems, Inc. 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairchild Airforce Base 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000006128 USAF FAIRCHILD CONTINGENCY LABOR 20 FTE
NAT-TCR Valley Sales, Inc 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pennsylvania Hospital 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Trail Waste Systems 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HEC Mfg 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 8007 Elston 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blackhawk 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #12 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toshiba Business Solutions - Charlotte 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.