Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Ohio

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc

Lancaster, OH · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc safety composite

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc held a steady TCR band

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Lancaster, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/300
  • PHOTO Ritter Plumbing Co. …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ritter Plumbing Co. Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 300 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Ohio.

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc (32 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc
Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc (32 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Fairfield Heating and Cooling, Inc has fewer employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Lancaster

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 96 employers in Lancaster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ritter Plumbing Co. Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR All States Mechanical LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Associated Fire Protection, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bernhard MCC, LLC - Louisiana 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Custom Agri Systems - Upper Sandusky 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tiffin Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Electric, Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfield Medical Center 2,049 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking Plant 1 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anchor Hocking 688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treehouse Foods, Lancaster OH 329 FTE
NAT-TCR Boeing Distribution Inc. - Parsippany 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cook Sales Inc. Mississippi 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Meriter Business Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Junction Hot Batch Plant 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Marine City 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mosaic Nevada 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Americold Gadsden, AL 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAN-M 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.