Hotels (except casino hotels) · Idaho

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa

Nampa, ID · ~20 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa runs at 182% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa: 5.5 TCR = 182% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa safety composite

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa: 10.8 → 11.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 15.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa's TCR rose 1.1 from 10.8 in 2016 to 11.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Nampa, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 182% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/37
  • PHOTO Francisco Grande USA…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Francisco Grande USA Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa averages 5.5 TCR (182% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=11.1 · 2020=15.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=11.9 · BLS 3.0

Where Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 37 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Idaho.

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa (20 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa
Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa (20 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Fairfield Inn & Suites Nampa has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.9 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 15.3 7.6 1 1 0
2019 11.1 11.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 10.8 10.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · ID · Nampa

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 228 employers in Nampa, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Francisco Grande USA Inc 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chippewa Hotel Company, Inc. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thompson Dallas 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Hyatt Kauai Resort and Spa 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Holbrook 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Illinois Foundation Seeds Inc. - Nampa 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Forest, Inc 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hop Field 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BOI2 2,940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center, Nampa (Garrity)-SAHS-ID/OR 1,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 922 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lactalis Nampa 863 FTE
NAT-TCR Ames Plant 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rugby Manufacturing 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR RET-SEW Store 26 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR NH Office 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE La Quinta Inn & Suites Carlsbad 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Columbia 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE TownePlace Suites Albuquerque 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midwest Locomotive 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.