Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Wisconsin

Fairway Transit, LLC

Pewaukee, WI · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairway Transit, LLC runs at 208% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade F.

Fairway Transit, LLC: 9.4 TCR = 208% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairway Transit, LLC safety composite

Fairway Transit, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2017→2024

Fairway Transit, LLC injury rate improved

Fairway Transit, LLC's TCR fell 6.3 from 11.5 in 2017 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 20.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.5 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=20.8 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=8.0 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Pewaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 208% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #139/145
  • PHOTO SMT Laredo
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SMT Laredo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Fairway Transit, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairway Transit, LLC averages 9.4 TCR (208% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fairway Transit, LLC TCR series: 2017=11.5 · 2018=4 · 2019=12.8 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=20.8 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=8 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Fairway Transit, LLC falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 145 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Wisconsin.

Fairway Transit, LLC (37 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairway Transit, LLC
Fairway Transit, LLC (37 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Fairway Transit, LLC has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2023 8.0 2.6 3 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 20.8 12.5 10 0 0
2020 10.4 6.2 5 0 0
2019 12.8 1.8 7 0 0
2018 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 11.5 6.5 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · WI · Pewaukee

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 95 employers in Pewaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SMT Laredo 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landair Transport HSS 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 05 SMX LTL 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Salt Lake Terminal-NON DOT 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Habelman Bros. Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamers Dairy, Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wissota Hydro Plant 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stevens Point 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR CORPORATE 610 FTE
CITY-NEAR PEWAUKEE WI 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SWI1 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOTAL MECHANICAL, Inc 268 FTE
NAT-TCR Rocky Mountain Spice Company 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Four Chaplains Nursing Care Center 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR OB Renton Inc 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR FC: Denver 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 02023-02-02-KENT 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 08000-08-08-COBURG 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 01051-01-01-TANGENT 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shady Oak Nursing and Rehab 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.