Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

Faith Farming, LP

Santa Maria, CA · ~164 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Faith Farming, LP runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade C.

Faith Farming, LP: 5.1 TCR = 114% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Faith Farming, LP safety composite

Faith Farming, LP scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2017→2024

Faith Farming, LP injury rate improved

Faith Farming, LP's TCR fell 0.8 from 6.8 in 2017 to 6.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.8 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=6.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Santa Maria, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.1 · 114% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #357/620
  • PHOTO ADAN'S TRUCKING
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~164 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ADAN'S TRUCKING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Faith Farming, LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Faith Farming, LP averages 5.1 TCR (114% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Faith Farming, LP TCR series: 2017=6.8 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=6 · BLS 4.5

Where Faith Farming, LP falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #357 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

Faith Farming, LP (164 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Faith Farming, LP
Faith Farming, LP (164 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Faith Farming, LP has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.0 4.9 11 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 5 0 0
2022 5.5 3.9 6 4 0
2021 1.3 0.7 2 0 0
2020 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2019 7.8 6.0 11 2 0
2018 7.9 7.2 12 0 0
2017 6.8 4.4 8 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Santa Maria

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 280 employers in Santa Maria, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ADAN'S TRUCKING 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR la prenda vineyards mgt 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR JSH Farms, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Markarian Family L.P. 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cottonwood 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Shippers | Exeter Packinghouse 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE GloriAnn Farms Brawley 164 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Packing, Inc. 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rancho Nuevo Harvesting, Inc. 2,290 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030364 2,110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030364-364001 MARIAN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marian Regional Medical Center 2,021 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens & Minor Bordentown 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Envelope Printery, Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sargent Metal 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #35 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE USA PA Rochester Plant 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Long Haul Trucking 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethea Retirement Community 164 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Northern Corporation - Twin Cities Fulfillment 164 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.