Temporary staffing services · California
Los Angeles Field Office
Los Angeles, CA · ~164 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 39.3
- Avg TCR
- 2.6
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Los Angeles Field Office runs at 1510% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Temporary staffing services workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 39.3
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.6
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 142
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Los Angeles Field Office's OSHA Total Case Rate of 39.3 to the Temporary staffing services BLS benchmark of 2.6 (1510% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Los Angeles Field Office's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.6 industry benchmark.
Where Los Angeles Field Office falls in its industry
1,186 Temporary staffing services establishmentsSafer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 90 Temporary staffing services employers in California.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 142 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for Los Angeles Field Office are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 561320 - Temporary staffing services.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
46 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 361,677 hours worked = 25.44 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Field Office (this establishment) | 39.26 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Temporary staffing services industry avg | 2.60 | BLS IIF, NAICS 561320 |
| California state avg (all industries) | 5.64 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Los Angeles Field Office to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 71 reportable incidents · 70 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 72 reportable incidents · 72 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39.3 | 25.4 | 70 | 1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 85.1 | 20.1 | 72 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Los Angeles Field Office's reported OSHA injury record versus its Temporary staffing services peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 1510% of the Temporary staffing services benchmark, Los Angeles Field Office reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Temporary staffing services sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Los Angeles Field Office's safety grade?
How many injuries has Los Angeles Field Office reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within California, and by nearby establishments in Los Angeles - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~39.3)
Similar size (~164 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.