Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · Connecticut

Families in Recovery Program

Norwalk, CT · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Families in Recovery Program runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade C.

Families in Recovery Program: 4.0 TCR = 106% of Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Families in Recovery Program safety composite

Families in Recovery Program scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Families in Recovery Program: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 6.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2024

Families in Recovery Program's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2019 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Norwalk, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 106% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #16/37
  • PHOTO Applewood Centers - …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Applewood Centers - Jones Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Families in Recovery Program in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Families in Recovery Program averages 4.0 TCR (106% of the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Families in Recovery Program TCR series: 2019=0 · 2023=6.9 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Families in Recovery Program falls in its industry

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 37 Drug addiction rehabilitation employers in Connecticut.

Families in Recovery Program (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Families in Recovery Program
Families in Recovery Program (23 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Families in Recovery Program has fewer employees than the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2023 6.9 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · CT · Norwalk

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 140 employers in Norwalk, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Applewood Centers - Jones Campus 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Banyan Delaware 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridge House 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix Houses of Los Angeles, Inc. 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE InnoConn Construction Management LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE OWI Contractors, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Andrew Ansaldi Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cocchiola Paving Inc 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norwalk Hospital 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norwalk Public Schools 1,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR WLWAH 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Coast Enterprises, LLC 689 FTE
NAT-TCR Las Vegas 10172 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MALDEN-MA19 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maddox Air & Electrical 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DVP 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE S.P. Richards Boston 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rossman Apiaries LLC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Petland Cicero 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scot Electrical Products 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.