Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing · Illinois

Scot Electrical Products

Aurora, IL · ~23 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Scot Electrical Products runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Scot Electrical Products: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Scot Electrical Products safety composite

Scot Electrical Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Scot Electrical Products held a steady TCR band

Scot Electrical Products's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334210 · Aurora, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO ENGINUITY COMMUNICAT…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ENGINUITY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Scot Electrical Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Scot Electrical Products averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Scot Electrical Products TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Scot Electrical Products falls in its industry

42 Carrier equipment (i.e., analo establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Carrier equipment (i.e., analo employers in Illinois.

Scot Electrical Products (23 employees, TCR 1.0) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 28 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Scot Electrical Products
Scot Electrical Products (23 employees, TCR 1.0) among 27 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Scot Electrical Products has fewer employees than the Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334210 · IL · Aurora

42 Carrier equipment (i.e., analog, digital), telephone, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 325 employers in Aurora, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ENGINUITY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SubCom, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MultiTech Systems Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transition Networks, Inc. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oak Grove 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Farms, LLC. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mendota Office 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nokomis Area Fire Protection District 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indian Prairie School District 204 3,309 FTE
CITY-NEAR Factor Aurora 2,167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rush Copley Medical Center, Inc. 2,163 FTE
CITY-NEAR ANDY FRAIN SERVICES INC 2,100 FTE
NAT-TCR Holly Custom Print Company, LLC 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR McGriff Tire Company 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Berumen'S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Petland Cicero 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE S.P. Richards Boston 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Families in Recovery Program 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Petland Florence 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.