621610 Home Health Care Services · Ohio

Family Tree Home Care Services

Aurora, OH · ~40 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
5.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Family Tree Home Care Services runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical 621610 Home Health Care Services workplace, earning a grade C.

Family Tree Home Care Services: 4.5 TCR = 86% of 621610 Home Health Care Services BLS 5.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Family Tree Home Care Services safety composite

Family Tree Home Care Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Family Tree Home Care Services held a steady TCR band

Family Tree Home Care Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621610 · Aurora, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #86/131
  • PHOTO Sutter Care at Home …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sutter Care at Home (30048) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Family Tree Home Care Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Family Tree Home Care Services averages 4.5 TCR (86% of the 621610 Home Health Care Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Family Tree Home Care Services TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=8 · 2020=11.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.2

Where Family Tree Home Care Services falls in its industry

3,635 621610 Home Health Care Servic establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 131 621610 Home Health Care Servic employers in Ohio.

Family Tree Home Care Services (40 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Family Tree Home Care Services
Family Tree Home Care Services (40 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Family Tree Home Care Services has fewer employees than the 621610 Home Health Care Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 15.3 15.3 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.6 3.9 2 1 0
2019 8.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 5.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621610 · OH · Aurora

3,635 621610 Home Health Care Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 64 employers in Aurora, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sutter Care at Home (30048) 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Envision Hospice Staff 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ERI 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corso Care Health Management 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Croton Pullet 2 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chemsteel Construction Company 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky Restoration Contractors Toledo 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Construction Company LLC (Akron) 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora, OH - 05 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3250 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3250 302 FTE
CITY-NEAR PartsSource, Inc. 279 FTE
NAT-TCR Curtis Machine Company 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency Baltimore Inner Harbor 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR White Bear Lincoln 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR San Benito 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bosk Corporation 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE S & S Machine Shop, Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virtus Nutrition, LLC 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Love Box) LLC 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.