Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities · Ohio

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1

Tiffin, OH · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 runs at 498% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1: 18.9 TCR = 498% of Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 safety composite

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.1

2023→2024

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 injury rate improved

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1's TCR fell 31.1 from 34.5 in 2023 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 34.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=34.5 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Tiffin, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 498% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #153/155
  • PHOTO CASE CORE OFFICE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CASE CORE OFFICE (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 averages 18.9 TCR (498% of the Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 TCR series: 2023=34.5 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 falls in its industry

2,261 Residential Intellectual and D establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #153 safest of 155 Residential Intellectual and D employers in Ohio.

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 (40 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1
Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 (40 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Seneca Facility 1 Seneca Facility 1 has fewer employees than the Residential Intellectual and Development median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2023 34.5 28.2 3 8 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · OH · Tiffin

2,261 Residential Intellectual and Developmental Disability Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 66 employers in Tiffin, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CASE CORE OFFICE 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Ridge 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aacres Tacoma - 20008 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Phoenix at Ludden 18.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Croton Pullet 2 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chemsteel Construction Company 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky Restoration Contractors Toledo 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Construction Company LLC (Akron) 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Tiffin Hospital 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Tiffin Hospital 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tiffin Hospital 397 FTE
CITY-NEAR National Machinery LLC 396 FTE
NAT-TCR The City of Bloomington - Fire Dept 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Station 5: Lake 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Water Department 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Washington Penn - V-BAT 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 07 Omaha, NE 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Turnamics, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neall - Alliance 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.