Cold storage warehousing · Ohio

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights

Maple Heights, OH · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights runs at 25% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cold storage warehousing workplace, earning a grade A.

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights: 1.4 TCR = 25% of Cold storage warehousing BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights safety composite

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2020→2023

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights injury rate improved

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Maple Heights, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 25% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/34
  • PHOTO Syracuse
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Syracuse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights averages 1.4 TCR (25% of the Cold storage warehousing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights TCR series: 2020=4.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights falls in its industry

1,039 Cold storage warehousing establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 34 Cold storage warehousing employers in Ohio.

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights (32 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights
Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights (32 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Fannie May Confections Brands, Inc. Maple Heights has fewer employees than the Cold storage warehousing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · OH · Maple Heights

1,039 Cold storage warehousing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 22 employers in Maple Heights, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Syracuse 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americold Murfreesboro, TN 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sanofi Taylor Distribution 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RLS Logistics Cold Storage of Lebanon 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Custom Agri Systems - Upper Sandusky 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tiffin Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Electric, Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherwood Foods-Ohio 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Factory Direct 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Maple Heights Operating Co., LLC 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Sunrise 88 FTE
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - CA020 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NurseCore of Syracuse HC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Scottsdale Fashion Square 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dallas Ft. Worth 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE B & C Construction Company Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #5334 Hamilton, NJ 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milford Assisted Living 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Icr Drywall Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.