Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Fast Apple Logistics

Newbury Park, CA · ~57 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fast Apple Logistics runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Fast Apple Logistics: 22.1 TCR = 339% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fast Apple Logistics safety composite

Fast Apple Logistics scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.8

2022→2023

Fast Apple Logistics injury rate improved

Fast Apple Logistics's TCR fell 8.8 from 26.4 in 2022 to 17.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 26.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=26.4 · 2023=17.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Newbury Park, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.1 · 339% of ind

  • DART 17.6 DART
  • RANK #658/710
  • PHOTO 16
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 16 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fast Apple Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fast Apple Logistics averages 22.1 TCR (339% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fast Apple Logistics TCR series: 2022=26.4 · 2023=17.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Fast Apple Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #658 safest of 710 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in California.

Fast Apple Logistics (57 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Fast Apple Logistics
Fast Apple Logistics (57 employees, TCR 22.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Fast Apple Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 17.6 17.6 7 1 0
2022 26.4 9.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · Newbury Park

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 54 employers in Newbury Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 16 22.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 389 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riman Logistics, LLC 22.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Team Logistics 22.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blanc Vineyards, LLC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE MI RANCHITO FARMING INC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmland Management Services 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEWBURY PARK (WESTLAKE) CENTER (CANEW) 317 FTE
CITY-NEAR CANEW - NEWBURY PARK CENTER 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR People Creating Success 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR 151-70150-33207 261 FTE
NAT-TCR The Groves at Oak Ridge 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Glencoe 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Private Duty Comprehensive Services Inc. 22.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Becket House at Rumney 22.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE AC3, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wisconsin Precision Casting 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleroi Locks & Dam 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bashlin Industries Inc 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.