Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Indiana

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone

Columbus, IN · ~694 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone: 1.1 TCR = 20% of Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone safety composite

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone: 0.7 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 1.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.93× in 2019

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.7 in 2018 to 1.5 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Columbus, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 20% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #9/66
  • PHOTO EnovaPremier of Mich…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~694 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EnovaPremier of Michigan LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone averages 1.1 TCR (20% of the Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone TCR series: 2018=0.7 · 2019=1.5 · BLS 5.4

Where Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone falls in its industry

772 Exhaust and tail pipes, automo establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 66 Exhaust and tail pipes, automo employers in Indiana.

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone (694 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone
Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone (694 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Faurecia Clean Mobility - Gladstone has more employees than the Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.5 1.0 12 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · IN · Columbus

772 Exhaust and tail pipes, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 141 employers in Columbus, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EnovaPremier of Michigan LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BASF CORPORATION 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wheelimage Corp 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avancez LLC 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Government 694 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cook Inc. Spencer 697 FTE
STATE-SIZE Union Hospital Terre Haute 697 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evansville Bakery 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Toyota Material Handling, Inc. 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR NTN Driveshaft Inc. 1,756 FTE
CITY-NEAR Columbus Engine Plant 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Commons Office Building 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Sales - Windsor, 1360 19th Hold Drive, Suite 100, Windsor, CA 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Transportation-Lovington 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1430 Sycamore Rd 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CECO Concrete : Knoxville Equipment Ctr. 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2045-00006W 694 FTE
NAT-SIZE SNRMCA69 694 FTE
NAT-SIZE Off Location Tioga 694 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foodservice : TEMPLE 694 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.