Materials recovery facilities (MRF) · Texas

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF)

Dallas, TX · ~112 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Materials recovery facilities (MRF) workplace, earning a grade C.

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF): 2.4 TCR = 93% of Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) safety composite

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2023→2024

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) injury rate improved

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF)'s TCR fell 0.6 from 2.7 in 2023 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.7 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562920 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 93% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #19/40
  • PHOTO ARC Alabama LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~112 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARC Alabama LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) averages 2.4 TCR (93% of the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) TCR series: 2023=2.7 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 2.6

Where FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) falls in its industry

422 Materials recovery facilities establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 40 Materials recovery facilities employers in Texas.

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) (112 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF)
FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) (112 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 3.8

FCC Environmental Services Texas, LLC (Dallas MRF) has more employees than the Materials recovery facilities (MRF) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2023 2.7 1.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562920 · TX · Dallas

422 Materials recovery facilities (MRF) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARC Alabama LLC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zwicky Processing and Recycling Inc 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR S05935 - Syracuse MRF 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S09087 - Billerica MRF 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bison Drilling & Field Services, LLC 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance TX 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Panda Power Funds 112 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cattlemen 1 Solar 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Mt. Pleasant 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ladel - Delhi 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Basic Concepts Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gowanda Electronics 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tremcar USA Inc 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Faber Construction 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ortho Biologics, LLC 112 FTE
NAT-SIZE Andy Mast Greenhouses 112 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.