Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing · Minnesota

Federal Package Network, Inc.

Chanhassen, MN · ~78 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Federal Package Network, Inc. runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Federal Package Network, Inc.: 5.2 TCR = 157% of Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Federal Package Network, Inc. safety composite

Federal Package Network, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2024

Federal Package Network, Inc. injury rate improved

Federal Package Network, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 5.0 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=6.0 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326112 · Chanhassen, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 157% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Signode - Douglasvil…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Signode - Douglasville, GA (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Federal Package Network, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Federal Package Network, Inc. averages 5.2 TCR (157% of the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Federal Package Network, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=6 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=4.4 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Federal Package Network, Inc. falls in its industry

396 Film, plastics, packaging, man establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Film, plastics, packaging, man employers in Minnesota.

Federal Package Network, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Federal Package Network, Inc.
Federal Package Network, Inc. (78 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Federal Package Network, Inc. has fewer employees than the Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.0 4 0 0
2023 4.4 2.2 4 0 0
2022 5.8 0.0 5 0 0
2020 6.0 2.4 2 3 0
2019 6.6 3.3 3 1 0
2018 4.8 3.2 2 1 0
2017 5.0 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326112 · MN · Chanhassen

396 Film, plastics, packaging, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 65 employers in Chanhassen, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Signode - Douglasville, GA 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 320 Barnes Road 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loose Plastics Inc. 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Statesville, NC 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Austin Utilities 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highline Construction, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wireless - Wanamingo, MN 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestige Drywall inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWCO Chanhassen 1,028 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHANHASSEN 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Chanhassen 596 FTE
CITY-NEAR TBG2 350 FTE
NAT-TCR ASPC-Yuma 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lanakila Pacific - Hickam Hale Aina Dining Facility 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Azcon Metals - Sterling Yard 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 2912 S 80th Ave 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Precision Vehicle Logistics - MAP 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE AAA Concrete 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Remlinger Mfg Co INC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hansen International Inc 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.