Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing · Oregon

FEI - Thermo Fisher

Hillsboro, OR · ~1,030 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FEI - Thermo Fisher runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

FEI - Thermo Fisher: 0.2 TCR = 5% of Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FEI - Thermo Fisher safety composite

FEI - Thermo Fisher scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

FEI - Thermo Fisher held a steady TCR band

FEI - Thermo Fisher's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Hillsboro, OR AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 5% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Edgewater/Norwood
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~1,030 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Edgewater/Norwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

FEI - Thermo Fisher in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FEI - Thermo Fisher averages 0.2 TCR (5% of the Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FEI - Thermo Fisher TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where FEI - Thermo Fisher falls in its industry

213 Electrolytic conductivity inst establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Electrolytic conductivity inst employers in Oregon.

FEI - Thermo Fisher (1,030 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate FEI - Thermo Fisher
FEI - Thermo Fisher (1,030 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

FEI - Thermo Fisher has more employees than the Electrolytic conductivity instruments, l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · OR · Hillsboro

213 Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 282 employers in Hillsboro, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Edgewater/Norwood 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher PAI 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific- Austin 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bruker Nano Surfaces - Madison 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Medical Center - Hospital 1,038 FTE
STATE-SIZE 800 1,043 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ronler Acres Campus 11,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jones Farm Campus 7,114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aloha Campus 1,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Farm Campus 1,638 FTE
NAT-TCR Main office 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Two-X Engineers & Constructors LLC 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Air Products and Services Inc. 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Dog Operations 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : CLT5 1,030 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Health NJ Cherry Hill - Formerly Kennedy Health 1,030 FTE
NAT-SIZE AdventHealth Palm Coast 1,030 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.